|
| ▲ | wasabi991011 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| We have progressive tax rates in Canada which should offset this to some extent. Also, you keep ignoring that the environment is a public good. Poor people in Canada will also be disproportionately impacted by bigger temperature extremes (heat waves, extreme cold), worse air quality, etc.) |
|
| ▲ | triceratops 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does Canada not have progressive taxation? How do poor people pay more than rich people? To be clear, I don't think rooftop solar subsidies are the best use of government money either. Governments should subsidize utility-scale solar, EVs, efficient buildings, and mass transit. They should focus on cheaper and more efficient permitting, and better grids. |
| |
| ▲ | tonyarkles 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > Does Canada not have progressive taxation? How do poor people pay more than rich people? It’s not that they’re paying more than rich people. It’s that even with progressive taxation, tax(everything the government currently spends money on) < tax(current spending + solar subsidies). That is to say… giving solar subsidies to rich people causes the tax paid by everyone to increase. Those making more money pay a larger fraction of the increase because of progressive taxation but everyone who is paying taxes pays incrementally more when the government spends more money. | |
| ▲ | AlexandrB 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Canada should invest in Nuclear. Solar is far less efficient in Canada than somewhere like California - whether rooftop or utility-scale. The short winter days, low angle of incidence, and snow means that panels are basically non-operative for 3-4 months a year. This is a huge problem if you also want people to switch to efficient electric-powered heating in the form of heat pumps. | | |
| ▲ | testing22321 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Great, if the break ground today the first nuke will be online in absolute minimum 10 years (likely 20) and cost absolute minimum of $15 billion (likely closer to $30 billion) Do you want to guess how cheap solar will be in 10-20 years, and how much power we could generate in the mean time. This is not a discussion worth having. | |
| ▲ | triceratops 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Canada already has lots of nuclear: https://ember-energy.org/data/electricity-data-explorer/?ent... The efficiency of solar does not matter in 2026. Panels are so cheap that just you don't have to think about it if you have abundant land. If solar is 4x less productive in the winter you just build 4x as many panels. Panels have to be angled more vertical the further north you go so the snow will just slide off. They are not "non-operative 3-4 months a year" - this is just Big Oil FUD. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nuancebydefault 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Rich people are usually early adopters of new technology. That's how technology gets cheaper. It's fortunate and unfortunate at the same time. |
