I am sure all advancements in the history of humanity was properly peer reviewed!

Including coca cola and Linux!

If you wanted to attack peer review you should've attacked peer review, not entire science. And if "muh science" was some kind of code for peer review then it's not my fault that you are awful at articulating your point. It's still not clear what the hell do you mean.

	▲	heliumtera an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Science funding is strictly tied to publication on "respected journals" which is strictly tied to this gatekeeping horrendous process. I won't deny I am terrible at articulating my point, but I will maintain it. We can undeniably say that science, scientific institutions, scientific periodic journals, funding and any other financial instrument constructed to promote scientific advancements is rotten by design and should be abandoned immediately. This joke serves no good. "But what about muh scientific method?" Yeah yeah yeah, whoever thinks modern science honors logic and reason is part of the problem and has being played, and forever will be