Remix.run Logo
TylerLives 7 hours ago

>how divisive they're in terms of politics

What do you mean by this?

throwaw12 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Dario said not nice words about China and open models in general:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-20/anthropic...

vlovich123 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think the least politically divisive issue within the US is concern about China’s growth as it directly threatens the US’s ability to set the world’s agenda. It may be politically divisive if you are aligned with Chinese interests but I don’t see anything politically divisive for a US audience. I expect Chinese CEOs speak in similar terms to a Chinese audience in terms of making sure they’re decoupled from the now unstable US political machine.

subscribed 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Looking at the last year's US agenda I'm okay with that.

cmrdporcupine 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"... for a US audience"

And that's the rub.

Many of us are not.

giancarlostoro 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

From the perspective of competing against China in terms of AI the argument against open models makes sense to me. It’s a terrible problem to have really. Ideally we should all be able to work together in the sandbox towards a better tomorrow but thats not reality.

I prefer to have more open models. On the other hand China closes up their open models once they start to show a competitive edge.

Levitz 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, there's no way it's about this right?

Being critical of favorable actions towards a rival country shouldn't be divisive, and if it is, well, I don't think the problem is in the criticism.

Also the link doesn't mention open source? From a google search, he doesn't seem to care much for it.

Balinares 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They're supporters of the Trump administration's military, a view which is not universally lauded.