| |
| ▲ | jeffbee 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | That mentions zstd in a weird incomplete sentence, but never compares it. | | |
| ▲ | F3nd0 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | They don’t seem to provide a detailed comparison showing how each compression scheme fared at every task, but they do list (some of) their criteria and say they found Brotli the best of the bunch. I can’t tell if that’s a sensible conclusion or not, though. Maybe Brotli did better on code size or memory use? | |
| ▲ | eviks 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hey, they did all the work and more, trust them!!! > Experts in the PDF Association’s PDF TWG undertook theoretical and experimental analysis of these schemes, reviewing decompression speed, compression speed, compression ratio achieved, memory usage, code size, standardisation, IP, interoperability, prototyping, sample file creation, and other due diligence tasks. | | |
| ▲ | LoganDark 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I love when I perform all the due diligence tasks. You just can't counter that. Yes but, they did all the due diligence tasks. They considered all the factors. Every one. Think you have one they didn't consider? Nope. | | |
| ▲ | jsnell 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | But they didn't write "all". They wrote "other", which absolutely does not imply full coverage. Maybe read things a bit more carefully before going all out on the snide comments? | | |
| ▲ | wizzwizz4 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | In fact, they wrote "reviewing […] other due diligence tasks", which doesn't imply any coverage! This close, literal reading is an appropriate – nay, the only appropriate – way to draw conclusions about the degree of responsibility exhibited by the custodians of a living standard. By corollary, any criticism of this form could be rebuffed by appeal to a sufficiently-carefully-written press release. |
|
|
|
|
|
