| ▲ | moralestapia 7 hours ago | |||||||
Since we are talking about LLMs, what I've noticed about the Indian/Pakistani "LLM" is they follow this way of structuring thoughts: 1. They 2. Always 3. List 4. Things ... and end up with a conclusion/punchline/takeaway. I always wanted to ask, is that due to training? I could imagine all schools around there have a specific style, like all their assignments need to follow this general form, and then they just get used to it and it permeates to their everyday life. | ||||||||
| ▲ | robofanatic 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I bet you haven't seriously communicated with others in a language that is not native to you. You'll probably end up doing similar things if you have to. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ragall 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It's due to training (I suspect both OpenAI/Microsoft and Google have been training on their entire corpus of internal comms and technical docs). After almost 10 years in a FAANG I also tend to write like that. | ||||||||
| ▲ | regenschutz 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
That's how all LLMs structure content, not just Indian/Pakistani LLMs. | ||||||||
| ▲ | otikik 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Well, imagine that you noticed 3 things instead of only one. 1. The first thing 2. The second thing 3. The last thing Makes perfect sense in that case. | ||||||||