Good. Humans don’t need to waste their mental energy on tasks that other systems can do well.

I want a life of leisure. I don’t want to do hard things anymore.

Cognitive atrophy of people using these systems is very good as it makes it easier to beat them in the market, and it’s easier to convince them that whatever slop work you submitted after 0.1 seconds of effort “isn’t bad, it’s certainly great at delving into the topic!”

Also, monkey see, monkey speak: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01754

▲

latexr 13 hours ago | parent [-]

> Cognitive atrophy of people using these systems is very good as it makes it easier to beat them in the market

I hope you’re being facetious, as otherwise that’s a selfish view which will come back to bite you. If you live in a society, what other do and how they behave affects you too.

A John Green quote on public education feels appropriate:

> Let me explain why I like to pay taxes for schools even though I personally don’t have a kid in school. It’s because I don’t like living in a country with a bunch of stupid people.

▲

Der_Einzige 12 hours ago | parent [-]

You could maybe give this book a read to understand why calling me "selfish" is a compliment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ego_and_Its_Own

	▲	latexr 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It was neither a compliment nor an insult, only a descriptor. I didn’t call you selfish (I don’t know you), but one particular view you described. For all I know, you may be the most altruistic person in other areas of your life, but that particular view is unambiguously selfish. And the least defensible kind of selfish, too, because it only benefits you in the short term but harms you in the long run. Either way, that’s not how compliments nor insults work. The intent is what matters, not the word. For example, amongst finance bros, calling each other a “ruthless motherfucker” can be a compliment. But if your employee calls you that after a round of layoffs, it’s an insult.