The site guidelines is supposed to be anything that a hacker finds interesting.

This feels a bit like dumping the manual to a Toyota Camry without explanation. It’s technical, but what’s interesting?

Maybe there is interesting stuff in here - but I’d love to see submissions do some kind of analysis to justify it - like an appreciation of an example of well-run user documentation, or a highlighting a clear and concise explanation of how a particular subsystem works.

These posts just rocket to the top of Hacker News with no discussion.

Sometimes a reminder for the audience is all it takes. Every couple of years we get new blood here and every year we lose some.