| ▲ | levocardia 3 hours ago | |
The only thing that worries me is this snippet in the blog post: >This constitution is written for our mainline, general-access Claude models. We have some models built for specialized uses that don’t fully fit this constitution; as we continue to develop products for specialized use cases, we will continue to evaluate how to best ensure our models meet the core objectives outlined in this constitution. Which, when I read, I can't shake a little voice in my head saying "this sentence means that various government agencies are using unshackled versions of the model without all those pesky moral constraints." I hope I'm wrong. | ||
| ▲ | cortesoft an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
I am not exactly sure what the fear here is. What will the “unshackled” version allow governments to do that they couldn’t do without AI or with the “shackled” version? | ||
| ▲ | strange_quark 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I mean yeah, they have some sort of deal with Palantir. | ||
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | citizenpaul an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
>specialized uses that don’t fully fit this constitution "unless the government wants to kill, imprison, enslave, entrap, coerce, spy, track or oppress you, then we don't have a constitution." basically all the things you would be concerned about AI doing to you, honk honk clown world. Their constitution should just be a middle finger lol. Edit: Downvotes? Why? | ||