TimeLine maintainer here. Their demo for live-streamed data [0] in a line plot is surprisingly bad given how slick the rest of it seems. For comparison, this [1] is a comparatively smooth demo of the same goal, but running entirely on the main thread and using the classic "2d" canvas rendering mode.

[0]: https://chartgpu.github.io/ChartGPU/examples/live-streaming/...

[1]: https://crisislab-timeline.pages.dev/examples/live-with-plug...

▲

kshri24 6 hours ago | parent [-]

The entire library seems to be AI generated [1] [2]. Not sure how much of it was actually written by a human and how much of it was AI.

[1]: https://github.com/ChartGPU/ChartGPU/blob/main/.cursor/agent...

[2]: https://github.com/ChartGPU/ChartGPU/blob/main/.claude/agent...

	▲	bobmoretti 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Given that the author's post and comments all sound like they were run through an LLM, I'm not at all surprised.
	▲	janice1999 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That was obvious before even looking at the repo because the OP used "the core insight" in the intro. Other telltale signs of these type of AI projects: - new account - spamming the project to HN, reddit etc the moment the demo half works - single contributor repo - Huge commits minutes apart - repo is less than a week old (sometimes literally hours) - half the commits start with "Enhance" - flashly demo that hides issues immediately obvious to experts in the field - author has slop AI project(s) OP uses more than one branch so he's more sophisticated than most.