This is cool, but there is no LICENSE file putting this in DONT USE territory.

This has a license: https://github.com/skiptools/skipstone but it vendors the other repo according to the readme? I am super confused about how this would work.

▲

marcprux 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The Xcode build plugin in the /skip repo uses the binary created by /skipstone (which is the repository that was just opened).

Thanks for pointing out that the /skip repo itself doesn't have a license. We'll fix that asap!

▲

zahlman 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

LGPL3 has now been added: https://github.com/skiptools/skip/commit/7ad94680a801ca393fe...

▲

gpm 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Huh, what does one have to do to comply with the LGPL on iOS anyways?

I'm sort of surprised that only the largest plan ($5000/month) and not the ($10/$500/$2,500/month plans) includes a license that doesn't involve figuring that nonsense out.

▲

speedgoose 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Which non sense? The lesser GPL doesn’t mean you have to license your firstborn under the GPL license.

I think it’s fair to milk enterprise companies that can’t read a FSF license. Otherwise the LGPL is fine.

	▲	gpm 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		As I understand the LGPL - not a lawyer - you have to somehow enable all your users to relink your application against a different version of Skip (4.d.0 since 4.d.1 isn't possible on iOS). This means that your application must do something like include a copy of all the files that went into linking the application and convey that to the users along with your application, with scripts to build the application against a different version of Skip... I can't imagine the app store would be particularly amused with this during app review... though I've never tried.
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]

▲

wahnfrieden 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You can chill - it was their oversight that they’ve already corrected, not an omission by design