AI is not submitting the slop, people are.

This is not a technology, but ethics and respect problem.

From the same article:

> Not all AI-generated bug reports are nonsense. It’s not possible to determine the exact share, but Daniel Stenberg knows of more than a hundred good AI assisted reports that led to corrections.

Meaning: developers and researchers who use the tool as it's meant to work, as a tool, are leveraging it to improve curl. But they are not skipping the part of understanding the content of their reports, testing it, and only then submitting it.

▲

account42 an hour ago | parent [-]

Technically true but that argument also won't let you bring your gun on a plane.

	▲	epolanski an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The purpose of a tool is important. Guns have no other purpose than doing harm. E.g. We don't blame cars, the tool, for driving into a gathering of people that can kill a dozen of them, we blame the driver. The purpose is transport, the same way LLMs for coding are a tool for assisting coding tasks.