Wait so who is being dishonest, the old article, the new one, or both?

nandomrumber 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There’s ample dishonesty to go round, no one has to miss out if they don’t want to.

Arguably, there are an infinite number of things that are dishonest, and only a finite number of things that can be honest at any given moment.

Therefore one can honestly say that there are effectively zero honest things, and the entirety of human thought and speech, the noosphere as it where, is the singular dishonesty.

The dishonest-gularity.

	▲	saghm 7 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm not sure that "effectively zero" is quite right; "approximately zero" seems more correct. And on that note, there are also approximately zero instances in the history of the universe where someone has responded to your comment, but hey look, I'm doing it now!

▲

LegitShady 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

yes!