| ▲ | 1970-01-01 8 hours ago | |
>Exclusively IPv6 without any transitional mechanisms would be difficult to succeed with. That's my point; why is it still difficult? What exactly are the pain points for a fully commercialized native IPV6-only business, and why do we think it will be easier to maintain the status quo? | ||
| ▲ | pixl97 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Because a few large companies are holdouts. Github for example. Some AWS backend stuff. Many smaller ISPs that represent a very long tail. Most of it is not any particular difficulty for you, but because of someone else. | ||
| ▲ | patmorgan23 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
There are still lots of customers with IPv6, if you go completely and totally v6 only then you limit your potential customer base. Now going v6 internally with a dual stack edge makes sense, Meta has done this. | ||
| ▲ | tormeh 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Many wired networks are IPv4-only, so you've excluded a bunch of consumers. It'd be like not supporting the Edge browser. | ||