You are asking two very different questions here.

i.e. You are asking a question about whether using agents to write code is net-positive, and then you go on about not reviewing the code agents produce.

I suspect agents are often net-positive AND one has to review their code. Just like most people's code.

▲

spolitry 21 hours ago | parent [-]

It seems that people feel code review is a cost, but time spent writing code is not a cost because it feels productive.

▲

swiftcoder 20 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't think that's quite it - review is a recurring cost which you pay on every new PR, whereas writing code is a cost you pay once.

If you are continually accumulating technical debt due to an over-enthusiastic junior developer (or agent) churning out a lot of poorly-conceived code, then the recurring costs will sink you in the long run

▲

damnitbuilds 19 hours ago | parent [-]

"review is a recurring cost which you pay on every new PR, whereas writing code is a cost you pay once."

Huh ? Every new PR is new code which is a new cost ?

	▲	swiftcoder 17 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Every new PR is new code which is a new cost ? Every new PR interacts with existing code, and the complexity of those interactions increases steadily over time