| ▲ | Hammershaft 9 hours ago | |||||||
Amazon is particularly wild because you can use the site without realizing %70 of your results are ads. | ||||||||
| ▲ | average_r_user 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I can’t confirm that exact percentage, but yes—“prime” placements on Amazon are driven by Amazon Ads. the Sponsored Brands banner at the top of the search results page, and the Top of Search Sponsored Products slots. [1] https://advertising.amazon.com/lp/build-your-business-with-a... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | Traubenfuchs 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I‘d argue it‘s often 100% unless you are looking for things so extremely specific no one paid ad/placement money for it. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | socalgal2 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I'm not trying to excuse Amazon but you do know what like, super markets, best buy etc, take ad money (promotional money?) from suppliers who pay for placement. That Samsung TV at the front being pushed at you, that's effectively ad money Samsung paid to have their TVs put at the front of the store. Those cans of Coke stacked at the end of the isle or piled up near the entrance at your super market? Coke paid to have them placed there. I'm not saying it's good or that therefore Amazon or Apple should be excused. I'm just saying, the naieve me thought Coke was on the end of the isle because the store thought it's what customers wanted. No, it's what Coke wanted, and paid for. And it's the same with Amazon and now Apple. | ||||||||
| ||||||||