I think this is 100% in your mind. The article does not in any way read to me as having AI-generated prose.

You can call me crazy or you can attack my points: do you think the first example logically follows? Do you think the second isn't wordy? Just to make sure I'm not insane, I just copy pasted the article into Pangram, and lo and behold, 70% AI-generated.

But I don't need a tool to tell me that it's just bad writing, plain and simple.