It wouldn't impinge on freedom of speech. Nothing would be prohibited from being said.

It would require conflicts of interest to be disclosed clearly. I.e. labelling speech incentivized by someone else (ad buyer) clearly, as not organic speech (the search engine results).

That is pro-transparency and ethics, not anti-speech.

▲

Marsymars 21 hours ago | parent [-]

> It would require conflicts of interest to be disclosed clearly. I.e. labelling speech incentivized by someone else (ad buyer) clearly, as not organic speech (the search engine results).

That's specifically what I'm proposing in the post you replied to?

	▲	Nevermark 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Ha! You are correct, that you were correct. Thanks. I misread a sentence, missed your nuance, and then off to the races.