| ▲ | iwontberude a day ago | |||||||
Forstall was an enshittefier too. Apple Maps was exactly what we are talking about. | ||||||||
| ▲ | atonse 20 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Apple Maps from day one was skating to where the puck was going to be. They had vector based maps when that stuff was brand new. Possibly before Google deployed it widespread (but I'm not sure on this fact). But the problem with Apple Maps was easy to see (and can only be fixex over time)... data. Google and others had a decade+ head start on Apple when it came to collecting data for maps. Judge Apple Maps 5 years old vs Google Maps 5 years old. Not Apple Maps brand new vs Google Maps 10 years later. Forstall is the one that pushed to make iOS based on macOS/Unix. He was definitely a lightning rod but had product sense. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | coldtea 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Strange take. Apple Maps was a new product. It's expected it would be behind Google Maps, maybe even forever given all the headstart and resources Google gives it. In any case, Apple Maps (a NEW then product, in an entirely new space for Apple) being bad, is not at all related to "enshittification". Apple Maps is absolutely the wrong thing to judge Forstall on. Not to mention that its main problem is coverage i.e. data quality. Regarding software engineering it's fine, even better than Google Maps in lots of aspects. | ||||||||
| ▲ | iwontberude 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I mean, we had gps nav that worked and Apple maps would instead tell people to go down railroads but okay downvote me. | ||||||||