This is the Apple I've always worried would emerge.

raw_anon_1111 a day ago | parent | next [-]

You mean the same Apple who will remove an app like Tumblr for a little consensual nudity posted by people and is too afraid of what Trump might say to remove X which is allowing none consensual undressing of women just by posting a picture and telling Grok to remove clothes - including CSAM?

▲

realusername a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's been like this for a while, the top results for a lot of known apps are scam impersonators.

So much for the so called "safety" of the appstore.

In fact, they had so many ChatGPT fake apps showing as top results that they had to do something as users couldn't find the real one and it reached the news.

	▲	alt227 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> In fact, they had so many ChatGPT fake apps showing as top results that they had to do something as users couldn't find the real one and it reached the news. This is after claiming for many years that the walled garden is a necessity to protect users, and their app store is a safely curated utopia which justifies the 30% fee cut.

▲

pixl97 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Capitalism pretty much demands it. Some companies can delay it for awhile, but the numbers must go up and eventually expansion because of a better product reaches it's natural limit.

▲

gtowey a day ago | parent | next [-]

Corporations always operate at the lowest morality level of any member of the company. Lots of executives can say no to dark patterns, but it only takes one to say yes. Then that exec gets to report the successful revenue boosting metrics. They will tend to get promoted and soon the entire leadership team is filled with people with the lowest ethical standards.

	▲	lapcat a day ago \| parent [-]
		> Lots of executives can say no to dark patterns, but it only takes one to say yes. I think the situation is a lot more stark than this. Unless they're desperate, the board of directors of corporations will install an MBA as CEO. In most cases, the only time this doesn't happen is at the founding of the company, when a founder is CEO. But if the founder doesn't maintain controlling interest, the founder can be replaced. The promotion of Steve Jobs to interim CEO of Apple in 1997 was a rare exception. Apple fired its CEO, and the company was in danger of bankruptcy. They were running out of options and feeling the aforemention desperation. Note how the situation was very different in 1985, when the board of directors chose John Sculley over Steve Jobs in a power struggle. At the time, they weren't financially desperate.

▲

etchalon a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Basically, yes.

With compensation so completely tied to "did our stock go up since you joined?", it's a whole thing.