| ▲ | joe_mamba 3 hours ago | |||||||
Greenland invasion is just a distraction by Trump from the Epstein files. The US already have massive military presence in Greenland with permission from Denmark since the 1950s, they can already do whatever illegal things they want there (and they have, like installing a portable nuclear reactor), without the downsides that come with actual ownership of the island. They already have a really sweet deal. Trump keeps talking about taking it because he knows the media will bite the bait and talk about that instead and forget about the epstein list and other illegal shit his administration did. Remember how he was also talking about annexing Canada in his election? Trump just loves to bait the media by saying crazy stuff since the media feeds on sensationalist stuff like that. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pjc50 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
He also attacked Venezuela, after talking about it a lot. The problem is our Kremlinology is no longer capable of discerning what's a bluff and what's not. Therefore, at significant cost to both sides, we have to unravel some of the interdependency between the EU and the US. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hairofadog 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
No doubt the distraction from the Epstein files is a contributing factor, but it’s a mistake to think he won’t do incredibly harmful things simply because they seem insane and without purpose to us, who grew up post World War II. His decision tree is like Does it make me feel like a tough guy? -> Is there some way I can leverage it for grift and personal gain? -> Does it make my political enemies and undesirables feel angry and helpless? -> Is it a decision I can make unilaterally? -> Then YES | ||||||||
| ▲ | soco 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
How about building in Greenland that "freedom city" all tech bros are salivating about? Would that be a reason enough to invade? | ||||||||
| ▲ | rob74 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
So, he wants to distract from past illegal shit by doing more illegal shit? Doesn't sound like a viable long-term strategy to me... But yeah, I also wonder what would happen if the media would just stop dissecting every late-night bleat (as some commentators have decided to call his Truth Social posts) and start treating them as what they are (the ramblings of a deranged 79-year old) instead? But of course those ramblings now spill into other places too: plaques on the "presidential walk of fame" (https://eu.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/news/politics/2025/1...), letters to allies (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/trump-letter...) etc. | ||||||||
| ||||||||