| ▲ | margorczynski 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why do people assume what currently available is the ceiling, especially after the last 2-3 years of explosive growth? Do you truly believe it won't get better, maybe even better at whole system design and implementation than people? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | abalashov 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Do you truly believe it won't get better, maybe even better at whole system design and implementation than people? What are you calling "growth"? Adoption, or LLM progress? LLM progress has objectively slowed down, and for rather obvious reasons. The leaps from GPT-2 to GPT-4 can't be reprised forever. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Orygin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It will get better, but the rate at which it does may not continue to be exponential. Past performance is not indicative of future results. While the agents models seem to continue to improve, I think LLMs as a whole have started seeing less and less benefits from the current scaling approaches. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 7777332215 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think what we currently have is pretty close to the ceiling for LLMs. But with the amount of money being spent there might be a new breakthrough (not llm) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||