| ▲ | kotaKat 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Employees who have an iPhone from Radboud University can continue to use it as long as the device is still functioning. However, returned iPhones will no longer be reissued." I wonder what the take rate will be from people rejecting the Fairphone and requesting their own SIM instead. The inner IT purchasing cynic in me says this is just a simple way to cull out your purchasing costs by only issuing one quasi-unpopular* device. * I used to issue out phones at a large hospital and we allowed device choice. We saw ~90% iPhones, 10% Android in our fleet. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Quothling 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If Holland is anything like Denmark the cost of employee phones can be budgeted as an operational cost, which means it's basically free. I doubt that is their reasoning. It's far more likely this is a part of the massive anti-US tech dependency wave which is rolling over Europe. Digital sovereignty is a hot topic these days. As far as what people want... it depends... A lot of people have two phones anyway, since they don't want to pay the additional taxation for using a company phone privately. Also because it's easier to turn it off when you're not working. In education I would imagine a lot of teachers/professors would prefer to not give their private numbers to students. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | eloisant 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Probably not many, the iPhone only has a 35% market share in the Netherlands. The Fairphone 6 is a pretty good phone. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||