I don't even care about that. My suggestion to him was earnest. I don't have a problem with LLMs. Just with how people use them. I just don't like "slop". I see the same user-interaction problems every time.

I just don't want people to litter their heavily polished immaculately styled products that have so clearly bad user-interaction design. E2e testing and closing the loop on LLMs does seem to help here.

Though I really would prefer people click around their own product for at least 5 minutes.

▲

jacquesm 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It matters to me. Depending on the ratio there is a line between 'LLM assisted' and 'LLM derived'. There are enough samples of open source code around this theme out there that this could be one of either and the goal to commercialize it is a messy one if the provenance of the code isn't clear. It would be great to see this sort of thing litigated so that there is at least some clarity rather than just a moral stance.

▲

pratik227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

So Claude Workspace is also written using the Claude LLM—does that mean you would stop using the product?

▲

jacquesm an hour ago | parent [-]

That's whataboutism, we're not discussing Claude Workspace, we're discussing 'Pdfwithlove' so you are avoiding answering the question.

	▲	pratik227 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		don't want to go in debate. It's ok, I used LLM to make a product faster