| ▲ | viccis 9 hours ago |
| >which is not a social network, but I’m tired of arguing with people online about it I know this was a throwaway parenthetical, but I agree 100%. I don't know when the meaning of "social media" went from "internet based medium for socializing with people you know IRL" to a catchall for any online forum like reddit, but one result of this semantic shift is that it takes attention away from the fact that the former type is all but obliterated now. |
|
| ▲ | LexiMax 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > the former type is all but obliterated now. Discord is the 9,000lb gorilla of this form of social media, and it's actually quietly one of the largest social platforms on the internet. There's clearly a desire for these kinds of spaces, and Discord seems to be filling it. While it stinks that it is controlled by one big company, it's quite nice that its communities are invite-only by default and largely moderated by actual flesh-and-blood users. There's no single public shared social space, which means there's no one shared social feed to get hooked on. Pretty much all of my former IRC/Forum buddies have migrated to Discord, and when the site goes south (not if, it's going to go public eventually, we all know how this story plays out), we expect that we'll be using an alternative that is shaped very much like it, such as Matrix. |
| |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Discord is the 9,000lb gorilla of this form of social media, and it's actually quietly one of the largest social platforms on the internet. There's clearly a desire for these kinds of spaces, and Discord seems to be filling it. The "former type" had to do with online socializing with people you know IRL. I have never seen anything on Discord that matches this description. | | |
| ▲ | andyouwont 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | And you won't. I will NOT invite anyone from "social media" to any of the 3 very-private, yet outrageously active, servers, and that's why they have less than 40 users collectively. They're basically for playing games and re-streaming movies among people on first name basis or close to it. And I know those 40 people have others of their own, and I know I'll never ever have access to them either. Because I dont know those other people in them. And I know server like these are in the top tier of engagement for discord on the whole because they keep being picked for AB testing new features. Like, we had activities some half a year early. We actually had the voice modifiers on two of them, and most people don't even know that was a thing. | |
| ▲ | LexiMax 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm in multiple Discord servers with people I know IRL. In fact, I'd say it's probably the easiest way to bootstrap a community around a friend-group. | |
| ▲ | nitwit005 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You're essentially saying you haven't seen anyone's private chats. I'm in a friend Discord server. It's naturally invisible unless someone sends you an invite. | |
| ▲ | thot_experiment 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah same as sibling comments, I'm in multiple discord servers for IRL friend groups. I personally run one with ~50 people that sees a hundreds of messages a day. By far my most used form of social media. Also as OP said, I'll be migrating to Matrix (probably) when they IPO, we've already started an archival project just in case. | |
| ▲ | esseph 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Idk most of the people I "met" on the internet happened originally on IRC. I didn't know them till a decade or more later. |
| |
| ▲ | dartharva 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'd say WhatsApp is a better example | | |
| ▲ | Ekaros an hour ago | parent [-] | | WhatsApp really feels to me more like group chat. Not really breaking barrier of social media. But then again I am not in any mass chats. Discord is many things. Private chat groups, medium communities and then larger communities with tens of thousands of users. | | |
| ▲ | nottorp 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > WhatsApp really feels to me more like group chat. So what's wrong with that? |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | munificent 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > "internet based medium for socializing with people you know IRL" "Social media" never meant that. We've forgotten already, but the original term was "social network" and the way sites worked back then is that everyone was contributing more or less original content. It would then be shared automatically to your network of friends. It was like texting but automatically broadcast to your contact list. Then Facebook and others pivoted towards "resharing" content and it became less "what are my friends doing" and more "I want to watch random media" and your friends sharing it just became an input into the popularity algorithm. At that point, it became "social media". HN is neither since there's no way to friend people or broadcast comments. It's just a forum where most threads are links, like Reddit. |
|
| ▲ | roywiggins 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's even worse than that, TikTok & Instagram are labeled "social media" despite, I'd wager, most users never actually posting anything anymore. Nobody really socializes on short form video platforms any more than they do YouTube. It's just media. At least forums are social, sort of. |
|
| ▲ | bandrami 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'll come clean and say I've still never tried Discord and I feel like I must not be understanding the concept. It really looks like it's IRC but hosted by some commercial company and requiring their client to use and with extremely tenuous privacy guarantees. I figure I must be missing something because I can't understand why that's so popular when IRC is still there. |
| |
| ▲ | lmm 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | IRC has many many usability problems which I'm sure you're about to give a "quite trivial curlftpfs" explaination for why they're unimportant - missing messages if you're offline, inconsistent standards for user accounts/authentication, no consensus on how even basic rich text should work much less sending images, inconsistent standards for voice calls that tend to break in the presence of NAT, same thing for file transfers... | |
| ▲ | Ekaros an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It is IRC, but with modern features and no channel splits. It also adds voice chats and video sharing. Trade off is that privacy and commercial platform. On other hand it is very much simpler to use. IRC is a mess of usability really. Discord has much better user experience for new users. | |
| ▲ | qludes 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because it's the equivalent to running a private irc server plus logging with forum features, voice comms, image hosting, authentication and bouncers for all your users. With a working client on multiple platforms (unlike IRC and jabber that never really took off on mobile). | |
| ▲ | krawcu 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | it's very easy to make a friend server that has all you basically need: sending messages, images/files and being able to talk with voice channels. you can also invite a music bot or host your own that will join the voice channel with a song that you requested | | |
| ▲ | bandrami 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Right.... how is that different from IRC other than being controlled by a big company with no exit ability and (again) extremely tenuous privacy promises? | | |
| ▲ | trinix912 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | For the text chat, it's different in the way that it lets one make their own 'servers' without having to run the actual hardware server 24/7, free of charge, no need to battle with NATs and weird nonstandard ways of sending images, etc. The big thing is the voice/videoconferencing channels which are actually optimized insanely well, Discord calls work fine even on crappy connections that Teams and Zoom struggle with. Simply put it's Skype x MSN Messenger with a global user directory, but with gamers in mind. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | flomo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You know Meta, the "social media company" came out and said their users spend less than 10% of the time interacting with people they actually know? "Social Media" had become a euphemism for 'scrolling entertainment, ragebait and cats' and has nothing to do 'being social'. There is NO difference between modern reddit and facebook in that sense. (Less than 5% of users are on old.reddit, the majority is subject to the algorithm.) |
|
| ▲ | ianburrell 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The social networks have all added public media and algorithms. I read explanation that because friends don't produce enough content to keep engaged so they added public feeds. I'm disappointed that there isn't a private Bluesky/Mastodon. I also want an algorithm that shows the best of what following posted since last checked so I can keep up. |