This is a problem, a net negative and a sign of a weakening society.

But, one silver lining, maybe, is gamblers are a little less likely to fall for fake news. Maybe?

It seems hard to be a climate change denier when you're about to gamble on it.

Or maybe people will find a way to gamble while still living in completely different reality bubbles. Probably.

If you thought your neighbor was politically extreme last election, just wait until next election when he also has $100,000 on the line...

But, one silver lining, maybe, is gamblers are a little less likely to fall for fake news. Maybe?

Only in a truth-agnostic sense. Good gamblers in player-banked games (poker; rock, scissors, paper) vs house-banked games (slots) are good at figuring out what the other guy is representing. The actual truth is much less significant.

I suspect that in practice, because a lot of online gamblers spend a lot of time specifically on X, they’re more susceptible than average to fake news.

> But, one silver lining, maybe, is gamblers are a little less likely to fall for fake news. Maybe?

Long time ago I was working for a betting company and we had a product where virtual (horses, dogs, bikes, cars) were racing in a virtual environment. This was displayed on a TV in physical branches and on the website, along with completely transparent information that it is all random, source of randomness was even some government audited hardware. The customers could place bets on these virtual racers, identified by numbers. Essentially if there were 8 'dogs' in a race, there was a 1/8 chance your pick would win. And then a new set of random numbers would be generated and based on that a new 'race' video would play. The 'races' would go on every day, 4 in hour or something like that.

And the customers (in the live chat or sitting in the physical locations) were often debating the form of the individual 'dogs', how they would perform in the next race and so on. Yes, really.

> But, one silver lining, maybe, is gamblers are a little less likely to fall for fake news. Maybe?

5 minutes browsing polymarket comments will dispel that notion really fast.

> If you thought your neighbor was politically extreme last election, just wait until next election when he also has $100,000 on the line...

I've seen the comment that prediction markets can be viewed as a tool for making conflicts more intractable.

[dead]

> gamblers are a little less likely to fall for fake news. Maybe?

Crypto bros. Remember when all of them were saying that NFTs were the future?