| ▲ | nathan_compton 4 hours ago |
| This is why we need to ban targeted advertising. In fact, I think ads should be 100% opt-in. The user has to accept them or it is illegal to show them to the user. |
|
| ▲ | mancerayder 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| That's what a generic semi-forced opt in via JavaScript is for, as we learn from the cookie opt in nonsense of EU sites. It's compliance for compliance sake. |
| |
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | But what could an opt-in requirement for advertising possibly mean other than a compliance checkbox that 99% of users click through? It just seems like where you land if you start with the intuition that ad-supported platforms shouldn't be legal, realize that implementing that policy would ban all print media, and do your best to rescue it rather than abandon the idea as unworkable. | | |
| ▲ | yunwal 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s not like print media would cease to exist if ad-supported models were made illegal. They would move to subscriptions like they had in the past. | | |
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Print media have always run ads near-universally, regardless of whether or not they have a subscription. |
|
|
|