| ▲ | throwaway150 4 hours ago | |||||||
Yes, but it is still a valid counterexample to: > I think ads will inevitably roll out across all tiers | ||||||||
| ▲ | MontyCarloHall 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Kagi is too small and niche to have a proprietary dataset across its users large enough to make targeted advertising generate more revenue than subscriptions. OpenAI/Google/etc. operate at a much larger scale, large enough for those proprietary user datasets to be worth far more in ad revenue than any reasonable subscription fee could net. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sodapopcan 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think they're saying it's inevitable for billion dollar capitalist companies. /not-s And anyway, companies that just want to make a really good living doing what they love are lame. /s | ||||||||
| ▲ | dmd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's really not, though. If a "valid counterexample" can be something with, say, one user, then I can make a "valid counterexample" to literally anything you choose, but that's meaningless. | ||||||||
| ||||||||