arm has toxic IP locks.

Everybody sane will want to move away from them, there is nothing chinese specific.

The most performant RISC-V implementations are from the US if I am not too mistaken.

Wonder if that hardware can handle an AMD 9070 XT (resizable bar). If so, we need the steam client to be recompiled for RISC-V and some games... if this RISC-V implementation is performant enough (I wish we would have trashed ELF before...)

▲

fweimer 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Is there an actual U.S. RISC-V CPU that achieves competitive performance? I think the performance leaders are currently based in China.

There's a difference between announcement, offering IP for licensing (so you still have to make your own CPUs), shipping CPUs, and having those CPUs in systems that can actually boot something.

	▲	sylware an hour ago \| parent [-]
		For instance, SiFive in the US, but last time I did check them, their RVA23 CPUs on their workstation boards did not have cache-line size vector instructions (only 128bits aka sse grade I think), RVA23 mandates the same "sweet spot" for a cache line size than on x86_64: 64bytes/512bits.

▲

geerlingguy 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Box64 already runs Steam (and a good number of games) on RISC-V.

	▲	sylware 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yep... but RISC-V large and performant implementations won't access the latest silicon process for a good while... better to push for native support to help.