Does this make any sense, to anyone?

I think this is an attempt to try to enrich the locality model in transformers.

One of the weird things you do in transformers is add a position vector which captures the distance between the token being attended to the some other token.

This is obviously not powerful enough to express non-linear relationships - like graph relationships.

This person seems to be experimenting with doing pre-processing of the input token set, to linearly reorder it by some other heuristic that might map more closely to the actual underlying relationship between each token.

I haven’t read the paper yet, but the graph laplacian is quite useful in reordering matrices, so it isn’t that surprising if they managed to get something out of it in ML.

it makes sense architecturally

they replace dot-product attention with topology-based scalar distances derived from a laplacian embedding - that effectively reduces attention scoring to a 1D energy comparison which can save memory and compute

that said, i’d treat the results with a grain of salt give there is no peer review, and benchmarks are only on 30M parameter model so far

No, its a new form of alchemy that turns electricity into hype. The technical jargon is more.of.a thieves cant to help identity other conmen to one another