| ▲ | AstroBen 17 hours ago |
| Their comments are full of "it's not x, it's y" over and over. Short pithy sentences. I'm quite confident it's AI written, maybe with a more detailed prompt than the average I guess this is the end of the human internet |
|
| ▲ | prussia 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| To give them the benefit of the doubt, people who talk to AI too much probably start mimicking its style. |
|
| ▲ | 4k93n2 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| yea, i was suspicious by the second paragraph but was sure once i got to "that’s not engineering, it’s cosplay" |
| |
| ▲ | AstroBen 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's also the wording. The weird phrases "Glorified Google search with worse footnotes" what on earth does that mean? AI has a distinct feel to it | | |
| ▲ | lxgr 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | And with enough motivated reasoning, you can find AI vibes in almost every comment you don’t agree with. For better or worse, I think we might have to settle on “human-written until proven otherwise”, if we don’t want to throw “assume positive intent” out the window entirely on this site. | |
| ▲ | testdelacc1 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Dude is swearing up and down that they came up with the text on their own. I agree with you though, it reeks of LLMs. The only alternative explanation is that they use LLMs so much that they’ve copied the writing style. |
| |
| ▲ | plaguuuuuu 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've had that exact phrase pop up from an LLM when I asked it for a more negative code review |
|