| ▲ | vlovich123 5 hours ago | |
In this thread we get to see which usernames display an inability to detect very obvious satire. | ||
| ▲ | Tade0 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I would laugh, but I've met too many people who either adore busywork or worse - seem to think no amount of additional manual stuff that one has to do will ever be a problem. | ||
| ▲ | wiether 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I laughed twice: once while reading the article, the second time reading people getting mad at the author in the comments! | ||
| ▲ | zahlman 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Presumably there are also people who simply disagree with the message being delivered through the satire... ? ... Or conclude that the message is contradictory such that it's basically just trolling? | ||
| ▲ | odo1242 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
A lot of them, it seems | ||
| ▲ | hypfer 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Honestly it needed an LLM to tell me that it is satire, because I tuned out at the 20% mark. The author seems to be so deep in the radioactive weeds that even if it is satire and they're distancing themself from it, they're still likely to already have experienced a near-lethal dose. Worded differently, I would argue that anyone who sees this and _understands it_ is stuck in something very unhealthy and needs to get out very fast. Using this level of satire as a coping mechanism just prolongs what shouldn't be prolonged (or exist in the first place). | ||