So, you don't think I'm wrong? The OP used "he" because they have a transphobic agenda?

> because we use to call a person who will always have hairs on his face as "male".

We may not have solved the question, "what is a woman," but you have brilliantly solved the question, "what is a man": a human with eyebrows.

▲

eimrine 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If someone uses "he" word it does not means antitransism. My point is that trying to euphemize "he" word is anistraightism. And I am even not an antigayist.

If your words can be reversed so easily it means that you have no idea but a pure propaganda instead. Famous anti-white-straight-man-ism seems as a dangerous thing to me, so I oppose this unfamous Davos-protracted diversity woke ideology.

▲

komali2 an hour ago | parent [-]

We're talking about the male pronoun used in the context of a discussion of a trans woman, not some kind of men's rights thing. Did you think I was arguing that saying "he" is bad because all men are evil or something? That's how faithless your interpretation of the arguments of non transphobic people has become?

Can you define "woke?"

	▲	eimrine an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I think you are saying that "he" because you support woke ideology. It is clearly visible since you were talking about trans values also. If you need me to repeat - I will repeat: I am not antigayist and I am not anti-transist. Woke is essentually anti-nationalism and anti-white-suppremacism.