| ▲ | exabrial 3 hours ago | |
It’s too bad solar degrades over time. I think it’d be more of a no-brainer if we could actually manufacture it at scale domestically without it losing its efficiency over a 15 year period. | ||
| ▲ | nicoburns 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> It’s too bad solar degrades over time... without it losing its efficiency over a 15 year period. Google says they degrade to 80-90% capacity over 25-30 years, which is ~double your 15 year time period. I've also previously seen people claiming that they then stabilise around the 80% level, and that we don't really know how long their total possible lifespan is because many extant solar panels are outliving their 25 year rated lifespans. Capacity reduced to 80% won't work for some high-performance use cases, but is pretty decent for most. | ||
| ▲ | gruez 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
>without it losing its efficiency over a 15 year period. Why is this such a dealbreaker like you make it out to be? It's easily fixed by over-provisioning to account for future losses. Not to mention that power grids almost always have more capacity than what's needed, to account for future growth and maintenance downtime. | ||