> Its omitting information which seems antithetical to the whole point of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia isn't a database of private information on individuals. On most celebrities pages you won't find their infidelities record either, unless it has some historical relevance.

> Its really not very different from a Wikipedia article using an author's pseudonym mentioning their real name.

In fact, when an author made it publicly clear that they didn't want their real name be known, Wikipedia usually respect their choice (until their real name stops being private information and gets historical relevance).

And somehow anti-trans activists seem to care much less. How surprising, really.