| ▲ | bob1029 4 hours ago | |||||||
Reactive power handling concerns are in addition to the issues I described. Not equivalent to them. | ||||||||
| ▲ | quickthrowman 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Gotcha, I think I understand now. The lack of rotating mass in a solar site means the rest of the spinning mass of the generators needs to compensate to maintain frequency and voltage, right? So when clouds roll in and the solar field output drops quickly, it’s a challenge for the rest of the system to compensate since any other generator that spins will slow down much more slowly, giving the grid more time to react. Also, I was not aware that inverters can only handle fault current that is 1.1x the nameplate capacity, that’s a big limitation. I can buy a 20A breaker with 200kaic, which is 10,000x higher than the breaker ampacity, which is extremely helpful for handling fault current. | ||||||||
| ||||||||