Look at the contrast.

We are teaching the sand to think and working on 3d printing organs and peering at the beginning of time with super-telescopes and landing rockets.

Then look at our leadership class. Look at the leaders of the most powerful countries. Look at the most powerful leaders in finance and business.

Look at that contrast. It’s very clear where the actually smart people are.

But those actually smart people keep putting leaders like that in power. It’s not a conspiracy. We do it. We need them for some reason.

I have two hypotheses.

One is familiar: they are sacrificial lightning rods. Sacrifice the king when things don’t go well.

The other is what I call the dopamine donor hypothesis. Compared to the speed and complexity of the modern world, most human beings are essentially catatonic. Our dopamine systems are not calibrated for this. So we sit there and do nothing by default, or we play and invent but lack the intrinsic motivation to do the hardest parts.

So we find these freaks: narcissists, delusional manic prophets, psychopaths. They’re deeply dysfunctional people but we use them. We use the fact that they have tireless non stop motivation. Dopamine always on. Go go go.

We place them in positions of authority and let them drive us, even to the point of abuse, as a hack to get around the fact that our central nervous systems don’t natively do this.

Then of course if things go wrong, it’s back to their other purpose: sacrificial scapegoats.

So in a sense we are both victims of these people and exploiters of them. It’s a dysfunctional relationship.

If we could find ways to tweak our systems like amphetamine but without the side effects, we could perhaps replace this system with a pill.

It would be more compassionate for the freaks too. They’re not happy people. If we stopped using them this way they might get help and be happier.

The order is wrong here:

Governance creates markets -> markets create innovation. These things have feedback loops into governance, but the tail ultimately does not wag the dog.

Engineers-- especially in the Bay where discussion of such is written off as mental illness-- often dismiss politics and governance as nonsense subjects that lack rules and are run by the mob/emotions. The reality however, is that these societal constructs have their own "physics" and operate like a (very complex and challenging to study) system just like everything else in the natural world.

The attitude itself is of course something has been designed and implemented into engineering culture by precisely the leaders you contend are scape goats to society. POSIWID.

How very Dilbertian. If one were to compress the above post into a comic, it would star Dilbert wondering why people with towering intellects like Dilbert weren't running the world in the first panel and then humorously demonstrating in subsequent panels Dilbert's disastrous and irreparable lack of understanding of messy human interrelationships and motivations that have to be navigated to not implode as a leader.

> We are teaching the sand to think and working on 3d printing organs and peering at the beginning of time with super-telescopes and landing rockets.

There are a lot of smart and skilled people involved in making a cutting edge chip fab. It's not one ubermensch in a basement inventing a new TSMC process by thinking really hard. There's technicians, scientists, researchers in multiple disciplines. All of those people have to be organized.

I don't know where you think the "smart" people are, but maybe meditate on the fact that "smartness" is not a single variable that dictates a person's value or success. Someone who is an expert at researching extreme UV patterning isn't going to necessarily run a great chip manufacturer.

It's pretty simple: those people are the absolute experts in their field, similar to those top chemists or whatever. That field is societal power systems.

Of course someone who dedicated his time to climbing and understanding power systems will have more power than someone who doesn't.

You got it backwards. We (which we?) don't need them, they need us. They can't play the games they like without massive resource extraction. If someone continually catches the flu, it doesn't mean they need the flu.

We don’t just use these people we create them. Since ancient Egypt the priest class of every society is employed to apply ritual trauma to psychologically prepare princes for their vocation of restless leadership.