This is really a job for JPEG-XL, which supports decode of portions of larger images and has recently been added to the DICOM standard.

iberator 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No. Jpg conpression sucks. Medical data should not be compressed loosely. PNG and TIFF for the win

	▲	vrighter 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		unlike jpeg, jpeg-xl supports lossless compression too.
	▲	nszceta 22 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The original JPEG supports a lossless mode. JPEG-LL refers to the lossless mode of the original JPEG standard (ISO/IEC 10918-1 or ITU-T T.81), also known as JPEG Lossless, and not to be confused with JPEG-LS (ISO/IEC 14495-1, Transfer Syntax 1.2.840.10008.1.2.4.80), which offers better ratios and speed via LOCO-I algorithm. JPEG-LL is older and less efficient yet more widely implemented in legacy systems. The lossless mode in JPEG-XL is superior to all of those.

dmd 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Or IIIF.