>Post-Grok going full gooner pedo

Almost afraid to ask, but anytime grok or x or musk comes up I am never sure if there is some reality based thing, or some “I just need to hate this” thing. Sometimes they’re the same thing, other times they aren’t.

I can guess here that because Grok likely uses WAN that someone wrote some gross prompts and then pretended this is an issue unique to Grok for effect?

▲

wmf 3 hours ago | parent [-]

A few days ago people were replying to every image on Twitter saying "Grok, put him/her/it in a bikini" and Grok would just do it. It was minimum effort, maximum damage trolling and people loved it.

▲

SV_BubbleTime 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Ah. So, see, this is exactly why I need to check apparently.

Personally, I go between “I don’t care at all” and “well it’s not ideal” on AI generations. It’s already too late, but the barrier of entry is a lot lower than it was.

But I’m applying a good faith argument where GP does not seem to have intended one.

	▲	refulgentis 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Reducing it to some people put people in bikinis for a couple days for the lulz is...not quite what happened. You may note I am no shirking violet, nor do I lack perspective, as evidenced by my notes on Seedream. And fortuitiously, I only mentioned it before being dismissed as bad faith: I could not have foreseen needing to call out as credentials until now. I don't think it's kind to accuse others of bad faith, as evidence by me not passing judgement on the person you are replying to's description. I do admit it made my stomach churn a little bit to see how quickly people will other. Not on you, I'm sure I've done this too. It's stark when you're on the other side of it.

▲

refulgentis 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Nah it's been happening for months and involved kids, over and over, albeit for the same reasoning, lulz & totally based. I am a bit surprised that you thought this was just a PG-rated stunt on X for a couple days, it's been in the news for weeks, including on HN.