I think my preferred version of this would be a hybrid. Keep the regular installer, add a file filled with information that an LLM can use to assist a human if the install script fails for some reason.

If the installer was going to succeed in a particular environment anyway, you definitely want to use that instead of an LLM that might sporadically fail for no good reason in that same environment.

If the installer fails then you have a "knowledge base" to help debug it, usable by humans or LLMs, and if it fails, well, the regular installer failed too, so hopefully you're not worse off. If the user runs the helper LLM in yolo mode then the consequences are on them.

Acknowledged. The standard includes a link to the llms.txt for a site at the bottom which is intended to give it that "knowledge base" to query.

I think I agree with you on it needing to assist in event of failure instead of jumping straight to install though. Will think more about that.