| ▲ | w10-1 9 hours ago | |
I agree a good exit for devtools is good for devtools. I'd like to understand it better. The Astro claim is that astro developers will all continue full-time on it. So why acquire it instead of supporting it? The reason given in complementarity (content and infrastructure), but doesn't that mean that Cloudflare is moving into content? Perhaps it's fair to say some content fits better with Cloudflare, or making it easier to just have static sites is beneficial to Cloudflare? Is there a convention about announcements, for the acquired to announce happily first to bring customers, and then the acquirer to confirm their benign intentions? When can we expect Cloudflare's take? | ||
| ▲ | sixo 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> So why acquire it instead of supporting it? Lots of reasons, but above all, control. | ||
| ▲ | re-thc 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> The Astro claim is that astro developers will all continue full-time on it. So why acquire it instead of supporting it? In defense? Someone else can acquire it. | ||