> I certainly did not expect this to be a serious browser, with any reliability or legs.

Me neither, and I note so twice in the submission article. But I also didn't expect a project that for the last 100+ commits couldn't reliably be built and therefore tested and tried out.

My apologies - my point(s) were more about the original submission for the Cursor blog post, not your post itself.

I did read your post, and agree with what you're saying. It would be great if they pushed the agents to favour reliability or reproducibility, instead of just marching forwards.