| ▲ | whynotmaybe 16 hours ago | |||||||
> Are those days permanently gone? Yes. When coming from DOS, all the UI/UX that could have been created has been created. What we have now is a loop of tries to refresh the existing but it's hard, mainly because it's now everywhere and it has reached maturity. As an example, the "X" to close and the left arrow for back won't be replaced before a long time, just like we still have a floppy to represent save. Cars have tried to refresh their ui/UX but they failed and are now reverting back to knobs and buttons. It seems that VisionOS is a place where innovation could come but it's not really a success. | ||||||||
| ▲ | IAmBroom 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Moreover, designers keep trying to justify their own jobs by changing fully functional interfaces, and then claiming post-hoc that the new UIs are better because they are better. Designers decided that scrollbars that shrink to super-thin columns when not in use were better. Maybe... but often it results in shrunken scrollbars that require extra work to accurately hover over and expand. Designers decided that gray text on gray backgrounds were easier to read, and there was even a study to "prove" it... which resulted in idiots picking poor contrast choices of gray-on-gray, without understanding the limits on this idea. I will say that the current push for accessibility is forcing some of these "innovations" back onto the junk heap where they belong. I was annoyed the first time an accessibility review complained about the contrast of my color choices on a form once... but once I got over my ego, I have to admit they were right; the higher-contrast colors are easier to read. | ||||||||
| ||||||||