| ▲ | jddj 4 hours ago | |||||||
Maybe it's unfair, unhelpful or overdone to call out llmisms, but if OP is reading this I stopped reading pretty quickly as a result of things like: > [CUE] does not just hold the text; it validates that the pieces actually fit. It ensures that the code in your explanation is the exact same code in your final build. It is like having a Lego set where the bricks refuse to click if you are building something structurally unsound. And that's despite having a passing interest in both cue and LP | ||||||||
| ▲ | CuriouslyC 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Ah, the negative positive construction. Another casualty of the anti-AI movement. The semicolon was almost certainly inserted manually in place of an em-dash, models almost never use them. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | bakugo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Maybe it's unfair, unhelpful or overdone to call out llmisms Not anywhere near as overdone as posting AI generated/revised articles to HN that are an absolute slog to read. A real shame, honestly, because the other article[1] from this blog that made it to the front page recently was good. The difference in writing style between them is striking, and I think it serves as a really good example of why I just can't stand reading AI articles. [1] https://xlii.space/eng/i-hate-github-actions-with-passion/ | ||||||||