| ▲ | mmooss an hour ago | |
Right, it was risk management. I doubt that leaking fuel would be acceptable risk management for a commercial passenger plane at a public airport. Obviously they could have designed something that could expand and contract if they thought it was worth it. | ||
| ▲ | lazide an hour ago | parent [-] | |
They designed special fuel that wouldn’t catch on fire under normal circumstances. Also, this was done because airframe skin temps exceeded 400F during flight due to the high speeds. | ||