The "prohibited uses" section seems to be basically "not to be used for crime", which probably doesn't have much legal weight one way or another.

I think the only restriction that seems problematic is not being able to clone someone’s voice without permission. I think there’s probably a valid case for using it for satire.

You might use it for something illegal in one country, and then leave for another country with no extradition… but you’ve lost the license to sue the software and can be sued for copyright infringement.