| ▲ | Desafinado 3 hours ago | |||||||
There is also the problem of familiarity. It's awkward. Traditionally you'd live around the same people your whole life. Invariably they'd feel like family and it wouldn't feel awkward to get together. But that's not how modernity works. People move to different communities all the time, so it becomes difficult to build familial friendships with others. That's the essential problem. The internet allows us to stay in touch with people who feel like family. That's what we want to do psychologically. If all those people were in the same city there'd be a lot more socializing. | ||||||||
| ▲ | 9rx 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> People move to different communities all the time Although now considerably less than in the past. Peak mobility occurred during the mid-1900s. Most, and increasingly more as time marches forward, will stay close to where they were born. > That's the essential problem. It is a problem for individuals in that situation, but does it explain a population-wide epidemic when most never actually leave their familial roots? > If all those people were in the same city there'd be a lot more socializing. I am among those who still live near where I was born and have known a lot of the people my whole life. Color me skeptical. Nobody has the time to. They're at work all day and when that's done it is into the car to drive their kid to who knows where to play in a sporting match thinking they are going to become a professional some day. It was a little different 15-20 years ago. You used to be able to go down to the community centre on a Saturday night and the whole town would be there, ready to mingle. But it turns out the draw was really alcohol, and when police started cracking down on drunk drivers and health concern messaging started to gain attention, it all dwindled pretty quickly. It's all about priorities, and socializing just isn't a priority for most people anymore. There are so many other things also vying for attention. | ||||||||
| ||||||||