Except for their unnecessarily incessant fund raising. [citation needed]

Fixed.

Its a widely known controversy

Sure I'm very familiar with the donation banners etc but still, how unnecessary are they really?

They have no actual "product" to sell and no ads.

At the same time I imagine a huge amount of traffic, that has surely gotten much much worse with the AI "renaissance" we're going through.

They have staff, etc.. So what's the deal with all the wikipedia hate lately?

	▲	daedrdev 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The controversy is 95% of spending, including 90% of staff, is on things with no relation to wikipeida that few care about, with exponentially growing costs, which they imply is needed to keep the wiki alive despite how cheap it actually is to run.