Amazingly ironic that in an article about a typo, there is a typo.

> "Tat sounds like the ultimate catalyst for the commodities market and copper has been hitting records."

"Tat" should be "That", imo.

you should've made a typo as well, as per tradition

I interpreted the typo as a meta commentary on the state of journalism in the 21st century.

I saw this too, awesome to report on a typo when you yourself have a typo. What are the odds?