I think this is a misunderstanding: > This is democratic erosion and why United States founding documents are singular in their importance.

Founding documents don't do shit. What one needs is a culture which is perpetually hostile towards power. All problems of power are social problems. No law, founding document, principle is going to prevent people from doing stuff if they want to do it.

▲

observationist 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You also need the formal mechanisms by which rule of law is upheld, protected against mob rule, and has a feedback loop in which course correction is possible. A culture hostile to power isn't stable without stable principles and a leviathan by which those principles persist, which is the whole point of the American experiment. The founding documents laid out a system intended to address the problems of the era, persist into the future, and adapt to the needs of each generation while protecting and maximizing the liberty of each individual.

If all you've got is uniform hostility to power, you've lost the plot and won't ever get past small scale tribalism.

	▲	nathan_compton 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I think its reasonable to argue that the founding documents have become subverted by changes in the political structure of society. From this point of view a too rigid adherence to the founding documents is just as problematic as a too weak one. In the end, it is the citizens which make the difference, not the structures. Any structure put into place will face relentless pressure from those who want power and citizens must be ready to present relentless counter-pressure.
	▲	CGMthrowaway 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		>all you've got is uniform hostility to power What is the evidence of that? I see a lot of people wanting a) more centralized power and b) who controls it

▲

pixelready 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, for France just compare reactions to these measures to the marching in the streets and general striking behavior you get from austerity measures, and the subsequent backpedaling by authorities. I can only conclude the average person there either just isn’t aware of this, doesn’t understand the implications, or doesn’t value these sorts of digital access erosions in the same way.