> This isn’t incremental improvement. This is a phase change.

> This isn’t about one person copying one idea. It’s about the fundamental economics of software changing.

That "this isn't x, it's y" really is a strong tell

We should develop a culture of naming mode-collapsed LLMisms, and shaming their enablers.

How about “Not-Just Abuse”?

Not-Just Abuse (informal, pejorative)

Definition: The practice of knowingly deploying the “not just X, but Y” construction—typically via a mode-collapsed LLM—to simulate insight, inflate banality into profundity, and efficiently convert reader attention into nothing.

And those weren't the only tells. Right now it's cringey but I have a sinking feeling that it's in the process of becoming normal. The post is on the front page after all.

Which means people either can't tell, or don't mind.

Bro, we can't afford to type them letters, bro. We hustlers, making the hard earned cash.